Post 10 (or, ethnic stereotypes on The Simpsons)

I love The Simpsons. It is a series that is on its 26th season and over 26 seasons it is easy to assume that maybe, possibly, some of the characters are not quite as sophisticated as Homer and are based on ethnic stereotypes. Although stereotypes are common on television and generally take on a negative connotation, they can be used to establish tone, mood, atmosphere, or familiarity with a subject. I will not cover redeeming characteristics because although racial and ethnic stereotypes abound, many of the characters are three dimensional beings who are not merely caricatures.

I will start with the most obvious: Apu Nahasapeemapetilon. At a glance, Apu is a stereotypical convenience store who works days-long shifts (because he loves it so much), has 8 kids (alluding to India's population), had an arranged marriage, and has a PhD in engineering. Furthermore, Apu's accent and trademark phrase, "thank you, come again" are some of his most noticeable characteristics but he is voiced by Hank Azaria who is clearly a Jewish man from New York. The series has also explored other well-known Indian stereotypes such as the accursed technical call center wherein people named "Steve" and "Jack" attempt to help us Westerners with our problems.


Cletus Spuckler, most commonly known as "Cletus the slack-jawed yokel" embodies the stereotype of Southern Americans with his thick accent, lack of education, and many children. Cletus is an extreme example of Southern hillbillies whereas Richard O'Hara, better known as The Rich Texan, is a stereotype of gun-toting Texans. Richard plays off of the stereotype that Texans love guns, wears a stetson hat and cowboy boots, and speaks with a Texan accent. Furthermore, he is known for firing his revolvers in the air and yelling "yee-haw!" at the top of his lungs.

Other ethnic stereotypes encountered include a few Italians, mainly Fat Tony and his gang, and Luigi. In Tony's case, he embodies the Italian mobster stereotype. His speech roughly mimics that of Marlon Brando's Vito Corleone and Luigi, an Italian immigrant and owner of a restaurant speaks with a stereotypical Italian accent and phrases.

Post 9 (or, my feelings on advertising)

Advertising, in all of its forms, can be intrusive if executed poorly or it can be clever if executed well. While I struggle to define my stance on advertising I feel it best to explore the spectrum of emotions and reactions to advertising both in individual examples and as a whole.

 I do not mind advertising as long as it is not intrusive. For instance, electronic billboards are, in my opinion, an eyesore. Besides some examples being poorly designed (which I will touch on later), I find them distracting and sometimes even painful to look at. I do not mind ads in magazines as long as they are not mixed with articles since I can simply flip the page and not have to look at it but advertisements on the internet are perhaps what I loathe most in the world. Pop-up ads, spam ads, ads embedded in news articles which are sometimes difficult to distinguish from the article itself, noisy ads – these are the bane of my existence.

I use Adblock when I browse the internet to subdue all advertisements because ads on the internet are so intrusive. They interfere with the browsing experience and tend to be extremely unimaginitive. I am, of course, referring to ads which read “Drivers in California don't know this one simple trick” or some such clickbait nonsense. I feel most ads on the internet are misleading and harmful to personal computers and thus should be eliminated but the money involved means that will not become a reality. I feel I am completely justified using browser add-ons such as Adblock because internet advertisements are intrusive and, well, everybody hates pop-ups.

Post 8 (or, an exploration of racism in advertising)

 I would like to an explore an older ad for the purpose of this post, and by "older ad" I mean an advertisement that is only 9 years old so it is still fairly recent and caused quite a stir at the time. I am, of course, referring to Sony's PSP White billboard which was put up in Amsterdam that advertises... the PSP.

So is the media attention

One of the interesting aspects of this ad has to do with the location in which it was displayed. This particular picture is from Amsterdam and the campaign was designed for the entirely of The Netherlands. What makes this important is the perception of race and race relations around the globe. In the United States, the ad is seen as the domination of a black person at the hands of a white person - the semiotic analysis gives us that quite clearly - but it is due to race relations in the U.S. that we picked up on the racial aspect of the ad. Some journalists have argued that the ad would never have flown in the U.S. and thus was created for the European market because slavery and segregation are still fairly recent in our nation's history. The argument, therefore, implies that the racial aspect would not be picked up in Europe. Let's ignore the fact that many European nations were involved in the slave trade; it was not solely the domain of the United States where most slaves were brought.

One may argue that the nature of the product (a special white colored variation of the standard black handheld gaming system) means that the advertisements will play up the color difference as a way to entice customers. However, products that come in variable colors have skirted the race issue by focusing solely on the products and by avoiding connections between the colors and race.

Post 7 (or, a closer look at digital media and environmental campaigns)

Greenpeace's "Unfriend Coal" campaign began in January 2010 amidst rumors that Facebook was going to build a coal-powered data center in Oregon. Greenpeace launched the campaign in February of that year in order to spread persuade Facebook to use renewable energy instead and thus pages were created on Facebook in multiple languages with titles such as "we want Facebook to run on 100% renewable energy." By July 2010, nearly half a million Facebook users had urged the company to stay away from coal power. This was followed up with letters written directly to Mark Zuckerberg's Facebook inbox. Television commercials, some which featured celebrity endorsements, were aired in California.

The campaign eventually spread globally with notable activity in Sweden, Uganda, Senegal, and even set a Facebook record for the most comments on a single Facebook post in 24 hours with the total being over 80,000. Over a span of 20 months, Facebook relented to public pressure and decided to invest in renewable energy instead, marking a clear victory for both users and non-users alike.

Source

Post 6 (or, thoughts on a sexist ad)

Of the three ads to choose from, I find the Alcoa Aluminum ad fascinating. It captures the 1950s aesthetic perfectly: from the hair style and colors to -- especially -- the sexist attitude. One could argue that the ad is a product (pun totally intended) of the time. Women were expected to stay home and tend to household duties. Women were expected to be mothers, predominantly, and to provide the family with food.

That said, the ad furthers the mindset of the era by portraying the woman as the keeper of the home and relegates her to household duties. Worse, the ad portrays women (if we extrapolate gender stereotypes from the image) as physically weak. The company practically boasts that no matter how weak a woman is, she will be able to open the bottle because the product is just that good.

Post 5 (or, an exploration of gender stereotypes)

Gender stereotypes may possibly be most visible in advertisements for cleaning products and food items, especially restaurants. Fast food restaurants such as Carl's Jr. predominantly employ attractive, skinny, white women in their campaigns. A quick Google search of "Carl's Jr. Ads" brings up pages and pages of images of women in bikinis eating Carl's Jr. burgers. The disconnect is obvious: why are these women, dressed as they are, eating burgers in sexual postures? Obviously the ads are working because sex sells but they are effective because they reduce women to being sexual objects juxtaposed with a product.

On the household side, ads for appliances or cleaning products generally tend to depict women who desire to purchase them so that they can clean and maintain the home. For instance, this Bosch appliances advertisement shows the evolution of their appliances between the years 1886 and 2011. What is interesting is that instead of showing a male in the most recent ads, the company decided to show women standing next to their appliances which reinforces the notion that women were responsible for household chores in the 1880s and still are today.

Post 4 (or, the issue of stereotypes in advertising)

Is it ever right to racially stereotype for advertising purposes?

Simply, no. If you have to resort to stereotypes to sell your product you need a new advertising agency or a better product. By using race or stereotypes as a platform to sell an item I think it reduces the credibility of the product being sold and undermines its quality.

Is racism in advertising a thing of the past?

Clearly it is not. Recent advertisements -- some of which we have seen in class -- clearly demonstrate that racism in advertisement is prevalent. For instance, this recent Ralph Lauren advertisement used images of Native Americans dressed in RL clothes. The cultural insensitivity of taking photos of Native Americans whose people faced genocide and prejudice and applying them to fashion is appalling and undermines the attitudes of Americans during the time the photos were taken.

Celine Cooper writes:

"Native American children were forcibly sent to boarding schools and prohibited from speaking their own languages. Traditional practices were forbidden. Many government policies of assimilation were enforced through threats of violence and imprisonment."

Do advertisers have ethical responsibilities?

I would say so. Mass media messages are being sent out to people in all corners of the country and the world so it would be asinine to assume that anything could be broadcast without repercussion. Advertisers have the ability to persuade the pubic and shape culture and thus should be aware of the implications in their messages.